New Report: AI threats are here. Why Q2 2026 signals the end of traditional patch cycles

Imported from official source

Cybersecurity Classified by Officially

You can’t patch everything. So what do you fix first? Findings in Q2 2026 have changed traditional answers. The latest Quarterly Threat Landscape Report from Rapid7 Labs shows vulnerability disclosures still surging while attackers use automation and AI-assisted tooling to compress the time between disclosure and exploitation. The gap that patch cycles were built to fill is closing. Speed and volume are overwhelming security teams that have relied on traditional patch cycles and reactive programs. Success going forward can’t be about patching as much as possible -  it has to be about understanding what matters most and reducing the exposures attackers can actually reach. Here are the four trends that defined Q2 2026, and what they mean for your security program as you define priorities for Q3 and beyond: The volume of disclosures hit another milestone There were 8,539 new high- and critical-severity CVEs (CVSS 7.0–10.0) this quarter- double the number reported in the same quarter last year (4,268). Meanwhile, the number of newly exploited vulnerabilities held roughly steady (40). The takeaway isn’t that exploitation exploded - it’s that disclosure volume is far outstripping...

Read the original at the source: https://www.rapid7.com/blog/post/tr-new-report-ai-threats-q2-2026-ends-traditional-patch-cycles

Officially imported this from Rapid7’s own source. If you work there, claiming the profile and verifying the domain lets you choose to show the full text here.

This publication has changed since it was first published

2 versions recorded. The original is kept in full — nothing is overwritten.

  1. v2 imported change on current
  2. v1 as first published on

Provenance

Organization
Rapid7 — imported from official source
Official source
https://blog.rapid7.com/rss/ RSS
Imported
September 18, 2026 11:35
Versions
2 recorded
Identity
blt33c0066fe8595689

Officially records where a publication came from, not whether it is true. Imported records are reproduced from an organization's own official source.