SEC Proposes Rescission of Shareholder Proposal Rule and Reforms to Proxy Solicitation Process

The Securities and Exchange Commission today proposed to rescind Rule 14a-8 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, which exceeds the scope of the Commission's statutory authority and intrudes into matters of state law.

The Commission outlined independent policy reasons for its proposed rescission of Rule 14a-8. Many of the justifications for adopting the rule either have not been substantiated in practice or are less compelling today, and the rule has had unintended consequences, including the implication of federal preemption that may have discouraged states from developing their own laws governing shareholder proposals. Rescinding Rule 14a-8 would leave determinations about the role of shareholder proposals to state law and company governing documents.

"Today, the Commission issued two proposing releases related to its proxy rules under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The proposals reflect two of my highest regulatory priorities. First, ensuring that the Commission does not improperly intrude into state corporate law when applying the federal securities laws. Second, updating the Commission’s rules to reflect developments in market practice and technology, and other innovations, since the rules’ adoption or last amendment," said SEC Chairman Paul S. Atkins in a statement. "Today’s proposals demonstrate my focus on ensuring that the Commission’s rules are within the agency’s statutory authority and reflect policy positions grounded in current and anticipated market practice and modern technologies. I look forward to receiving and reviewing the public’s feedback on both proposals."

The Commission also proposed amendments to Rule 14a-4(c) under the Exchange Act to provide companies with greater flexibility and shareholders with greater control regarding proposals for which a company may seek discretionary proxy voting authority.