Research: How we should - and shouldn’t - ban extremist speech
An essay written by Eric Heinze, part of a series of essays on defending free speech commissioned by Robin Simcox, the former Commissioner for Countering Extremism.
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
This essay examines how democracies should regulate extremist speech, distinguishing between different contexts and types of communication.
It argues that longstanding, stable and prosperous democracies should not ordinarily penalise speech addressed to general audiences solely on grounds of repugnant ideas expressed, whilst acknowledging that electronic platforms present greater risks requiring democratic controls.
These essays have been independently commissioned. The views and opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the UK Government or the Commission for Countering Extremism.
These essays were commissioned to present a diverse range of perspectives from authors with contrasting or conflicting opinions on this issue. They are provided to contribute to this vital discussion and do not imply agreement or endorsement by any associated organisations or individuals.
This is an extract. The publication continues at the source.
Read the original at the source: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/how-we-should-and-shouldnt-ban-extremist-speech
Officially imported this from Commission for Countering Extremism’s own source and shows an extract. If you work there, claiming the profile and verifying the domain lets you choose to show the full text here.
Provenance
- Organization
- Commission for Countering Extremism — imported from official source
- Official source
- https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/commission-for-countering-extremism.atom ATOM
- Imported
- September 20, 2026 19:52
- Versions
- 1 recorded
- Identity
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/how-we-should-and-shouldnt-ban-extremist-spe...