UNIDIR advances partnerships on AI, peace and security in Beijing

From 30 June to 3 July, UNIDIR Director Dr Robin Geiss undertook a week-long mission to Beijing where he met a wide range of stakeholders and discussed pressing questions concerning the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on global peace and security.

Mirroring a similarly diverse multi-stakeholder visit to Mongolia earlier this year, the visit deepened UNIDIR’s existing relationships in the People’s Republic of China and created opportunities to build new collaborations.

Strong partnerships are at the heart of effective multilateral dialogue and forward-looking research. They are one of four key enablers in UNIDIR’s strategy and essential for the work of the Institute. The Beijing mission illustrates what that commitment looks like in practice, spanning three distinct constituencies: Member State authorities, research institutions, and private sector actors working on emerging technology.

Partnering with Member State authorities

Sustained dialogue with UN Member States remains central to UNIDIR’s work. It reinforces the Institute’s unique role as a trusted partner and convening actor, especially in times of rising global tensions.

Beyond its regular exchanges with permanent missions in Geneva, UNIDIR places particular value on engagement with national stakeholders at the capital level, where policy is shaped.

In Beijing, UNIDIR Director held discussions with Ambassador Lu Kang, Vice Minister of the International Department of the Chinese Communist Party Central Committee. UNIDIR also met with representatives of the Department of Disarmament Affairs at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People’s Republic of China, and engaged with the organizers of the Beijing Xiangshan Forum – a leading platform for international security dialogue.

Across these bilateral discussions, Dr Geiss highlighted UNIDIR’s recently launched Centre of Excellence on AI, Peace and Security as a concrete mechanism through which the Institute can support Member States’ capacity-building needs.