Victory! Appeals Court Rejects Expansive New Copyright Claim

Electronic Frontier Foundation Version 1 original current

Imported from official source

 The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit handed internet users and programmers a big win today, by rejecting an attempt to stretch a narrow provision of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) into a new source of copyright liability.   The case involves Section 1202 of the DMCA, which prohibits intentionally removing copyright management information (CMI) like an author’s name or a copyright notice, from a copyrighted work. Open AI and Microsoft used code from Github as part of the training data for their LLMs, along with billions of other works. A group of anonymous Github contributors sued, alleging the new code coming out of these LLMs was similar to theirs—but with the CMI stripped out.   The Ninth Circuit correctly agreed with what we said in our brief: removing copyright information from a copyrighted work is fundamentally different from creating a new work that didn't have CMI in the first place. Section 1202 of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act was intended to serve as a backstop for traditional copyrights in the digital age—not to create a new, more expansive right to inhibit otherwise non-infringing uses.  As we a...

This version

Version
1 of 1
Recorded
October 04, 2026 07:30
Change
Initial
Content hash
463bd94f995cb995aabc45718bc2c67d
All versions
Revision history

Officially records where a publication came from, not whether it is true. Imported records are reproduced from an organization's own official source.