Research: Findings from the DRCF Algorithmic Processing workstream - Spring 2022

Imported from official source

Guidance

AI Classified by Officially

Two discussion papers from the Digital Regulation Cooperation Forum (DRCF) Algorithmic Processing workstream, on the benefits and harms of algorithms, and on the landscape of algorithmic auditing and the role of regulators, respectively.

In 2021 the DRCF established an Algorithmic Processing workstream to explore the impact of algorithms across our industries and regulatory remits.

As part of this workstream, we launched two separate research projects - one looking at the harms and benefits posed by algorithmic processing (including the use of artificial intelligence), and another looking at the merits of algorithmic auditing, as a way of documenting risks and assuring stakeholders that an algorithmic system behaves and is governed as intended.

In undertaking these projects, the DRCF members sought input from a range of stakeholders, including representatives from academia, civil society, government, industry, the public sector, and consumer groups.

In the next financial year (see DRCF workplan 2022 to 2023), we intend to undertake further activity in the field of algorithmic processing, looking more closely at how regulators might support algorithmic transparency, as well as what role regulators might play in the algorithmic auditing ecosystem.

We are now launching a call for input alongside the publication of these two papers and we welcome and encourage all interested parties to engage with us in helping shape our agenda.

Questions of interest for Paper 1 – The Benefits and Harms of Algorithms

  • What are your overall reflections on the findings of this paper?
  • What other areas could the DRCF focus on?
  • Which area of focus does the DRCF have the most potential to influence and which would you prefer the DRCF prioritised?
  • What outputs would consumers and individuals find useful from the DRCF to assist them in navigating the algorithmic processing ecosystem in a way that serves their interests?
  • This is an extract. The publication continues at the source.

    Read the original at the source: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/findings-from-the-drcf-algorithmic-processing-workstream-spring-2022

    Officially imported this from Information Commissioner's Office’s own source and shows an extract. If you work there, claiming the profile and verifying the domain lets you choose to show the full text here.

    Provenance

    Organization
    Information Commissioner's Office — imported from official source
    Official source
    https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/information-commissioner-s-office.atom ATOM
    Imported
    September 15, 2026 20:43
    Versions
    1 recorded
    Identity
    https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/findings-from-the-drcf-algorithmic-processin...

    Officially records where a publication came from, not whether it is true. Imported records are reproduced from an organization's own official source.